Walker calls Randall Shedd’s preference against the Bond an ‘unfounded scare tactic’. – Chairman Kenneth Walker Explains Cullman County Road Bond Support

Cullman County Commission Addresses Massive Healthcare Losses

Chairman Kenneth Walker Explains Cullman County Road Bond

While simultaneously calling out Representative Randall Shedd for engaging in ‘an unfounded scare tactic’.

In April of 2013, citizens of Cullman County watched as Randall Shedd was sworn in as a member of the Alabama House of Representatives.

In electing him to this position, the citizens of House District 11 placed a special trust in and responsibility squarely on the shoulders of Mr. Shedd. This responsibility is much like the one that the citizens of Cullman County have placed on each of their County Commissioners.

As the Chairman of the Cullman County Commission, every decision that I make has to be tested against the backdrop of “is it best for Cullman County?”.

That question applies to every decision including our Parks, our animal shelter, and particularly our county roads. Each year in establishing the budget for our County, I always wish I could place more resources toward our roads. It is during that time of year that it becomes increasingly obvious that the job of the County Commission is about more than roads.

In the current year, the Cullman County Road Department has a budget of $8.6 million dollars. It is an important fact to note that this budget number includes salaries for employees, equipment, materials for the construction and maintenance of our deteriorating county roads, as well as all other projects and operations.

 

Chairman Kenneth Walker Explains Cullman County Road Bond

Chairman Kenneth Walker Explains Cullman County Road Bond Support

In December of 2016, a statewide meeting of representatives from Counties all across the State of Alabama gathered in order to prepare for the issues impacting counties during the upcoming legislative session. During that meeting, a plan was agreed on by the Association of County Commissions of Alabama as to how to address our collective crumbling infrastructure.

http://www.alabamacounties.orgRepresentative Shedd has indicated that he would like to hold a referendum election in order to see if the people of Cullman County are in favor of such a plan.

While I would love to know that I had the support of each of every Cullman County citizen on every decision that I make on behalf of this County, I realize that is simply not possible. The citizens have elected me to do a job, and each morning I awake with a new energy to accomplish that very task.

Representative Shedd’s proposal to hold a special referendum election will cost Cullman County taxpayers approximately $100,000. This is money that could be allocated to roads and road building materials. If there is one thing I can state with certainty: the people of Cullman County demand better roads.

A unique opportunity has presented itself to the State of Alabama with the proposed ATRIP-2 bond issue.

As mentioned earlier, even though the County’s annual road department budget is $8.6 million dollars, not every dollar of that goes to roads and road building materials. The proposed terms of this bond issue require that every dollar received by counties statewide be dedicated to roads. The total revenue anticipated from this bond issue is over $19 million dollars for Cullman County, with every dollar of that amount dedicated to our roads and bridges.

The statement by Representative Shedd that Cullman County would be sending money to Montgomery in hopes of getting a portion back for road projects is simply an unfounded scare tactic.

 

Chairman Kenneth Walker Explains Cullman County Road Bond

Chairman Kenneth Walker Explains Cullman County Road Bond Support

The Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) is not involved in this proposal in any shape, form, or fashion. In fact, the Association’s inability to work with ALDOT and others regarding a proposed gas tax increase during the 2016 Regular Session was the catalyst that led to the Association deciding to advance their own present initiative.

Further, the terms of this proposed bond issue will allow Cullman County to choose road projects based on the needs of our citizens, and not be restricted to choosing “qualifying road projects” according to certain federal guidelines, as was the case during the 2012 ATRIP Program.

The implementation of this program will have no effect on the State gasoline tax dollars that Cullman County presently receives. The bond issue will create additional funds to be spent solely on Cullman County roads and bridges.

Having previously studied the impact of a local fuel tax, I learned that for every additional cent of local tax at the pump, the impact translated to between $85,000 and $100,000 annually. Should we attempt to pass local legislation for a local Cullman County fuel tax, then for every penny per gallon in additional tax, we can expect to add, at best, $100,000 per year to our road budget. Simply stated, there is no way to pass enough of a gas tax to have a similar impact to what will be provided under the ATRIP-2 bond issue.

While I have never favored a tax increase on the citizens of Cullman County, this unique proposal is a way for us to wisely invest in our failing roads and bridges. Sometimes, the job of an elected official is incredibly difficult, but I am thankful to have the opportunity to make these decisions on behalf of Cullman County.

Kenneth Walker
Chairman
Cullman County Commission

 

Chairman Kenneth Walker Explains Cullman County Road Bond

Chairman Kenneth Walker Explains Cullman County Road Bond Support

Staff Writers

The staff writers at Cullman Today are a collaborative group of citizen reporters sharing the writing of stories based upon their personal interests and work schedules.